{"id":45,"date":"2006-10-27T07:36:35","date_gmt":"2006-10-27T14:36:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/systematic.hrblogs.org\/2006\/10\/27\/soup-or-salad-how-about-an-appetizer-instead\/"},"modified":"2010-02-18T12:43:39","modified_gmt":"2010-02-18T19:43:39","slug":"soup-or-salad-how-about-an-appetizer-instead","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/?p=45","title":{"rendered":"Soup or Salad? How about an appetizer instead?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I started to reply to DoubleDubs&#8217; post: <a title=\"Melting Pot or Salad bowl part 2\" href=\"http:\/\/systematichr.com\/?p=550\">Melting Pot or Salad Bowl part 2 <\/a>but I got so verbose I figured I better put it down here. <a title=\"Melting Pot or Salad bowl Part 1\" href=\"http:\/\/systematichr.com\/?p=549\">Go read his originals<\/a>, then come back.<\/p>\n<p>I have a dozen or more vendor products in the mix, each with their unique UIs and generally poor ability to integrate via any method, not the least being a services architecture. I love the food analogy, but I tend to characterize what I want as being like Amazon. It&#8217;s a sure bet that they use content management, media distribution, shopping cards, credit clearance, inventory, their famous recommendation engines, user profiles&#8230;you get the idea. Yet at the UI layer it&#8217;s a single, seamless product. It had better be, because if they can&#8217;t get me to that last click they don&#8217;t get revenue. We don&#8217;t share that imperative, but we should. Then I wouldn&#8217;t need to take 2 hours of training before I can use the darn thing. Granted, we are more familiar with the shopping domain than with the employee transfer domain.<\/p>\n<p>So do we need specialized interfaces? They are a Good Thing in may cases. You wouldn&#8217;t want to use Photoshop or a Playstation with a mouse or keyboard. I support specialization and at the same time reject the idea that a specialized interface has to <em>look<\/em> unique.<\/p>\n<p>We have almost 40 internally developed point solutions. A few of them are big-ticket global apps and many others are specialty items for a particular line of business&#8217; unique needs. We just finished developing a set of interface and design standards for all of them. We developed a framework and then the UX team went through a &#8216;skinning&#8217; exercise to ensure that we could apply the standards regardless of the interface we were dealing with.<\/p>\n<p>This is not a melting pot. It&#8217;s more of a family resemblance. And it&#8217;s an important step towards aligning ourselves to the state when we stop being application-centric. Right now I have business managers, analysts and developers who live in their own silos. They know the rest of us are out there but it&#8217;s not their problem, they know their function and that&#8217;s what matters to them. By introducing the notion that they don&#8217;t get to design their UI independently, we begin to get them to look around and notice that we look alike. It&#8217;s an appetizer, meant to pique their hunger for the next course while delivering some real value for the consumer.<\/p>\n<p>I want to get us completely away from application-centric thinking, but honestly nothing can support what I want to build yet. The vendors have to catch up to SOA and so do we with our internal apps. I know this is true because we are using services and SOAP for some of our integration functions. It&#8217;s still immature, and I fear that that our vendors worries disintermediation results in partial solutions for a while to come and a lot of custom work on our part. In the meantime, I hope we&#8217;re making it easier by going to standard interfaces where we can.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I started to reply to DoubleDubs&#8217; post: Melting Pot or Salad Bowl part 2 but I got so verbose I figured I better put it down here. Go read his originals, then come back. I have a dozen or more vendor products in the mix, each with their unique UIs and generally poor ability to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[286,289,295,292,287,288],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-archive","category-design","category-enterprise-2-0","category-strategy","category-systematic-viewpoints","category-user-experience"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=45"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":229,"href":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45\/revisions\/229"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=45"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=45"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.andyscherer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=45"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}