March 22nd, 2007 by admin
Oracle sues SAP for “corporate theft on a grand scale”, according to Reuters.
Posted in Archive, Systematic Viewpoints | No Comments »
March 22nd, 2007 by admin
Double Dubs reaches the 2-year mark with systematicHR! If you’re reading this you probably know about this leading HR blog. If not, do yourself a favor and go.
Posted in Archive, HR, Systematic Viewpoints | No Comments »
March 22nd, 2007 by admin
I use Google’s personalized home page. This week Google enabled ‘themes’, an interesting break in their graphical standards. I find myself wondering why they went forward with this – notwithstanding a few playful tricks they’re little more than window dressing. The selections are limited and lean towards the cartoonish. I’m not critiquing the designs; my point is that if Google is going to allow us to tweak the UI I’d like to see more substantial controls like allowing modules to span multiple columns for better readability or changing font sizes, backgrounds or colors on a per-module basis.
Posted in Archive, Design, Systematic Viewpoints, User Experience | No Comments »
March 21st, 2007 by admin
Kathy Sierra creates personas for applications. Not only amusing as hell, but insightful as always.
Posted in Archive, Systematic Viewpoints, User Experience | No Comments »
March 18th, 2007 by admin
Google liked me enough to ask me if I’d move to California instead of working in New York. They claim the NY office just isn’t ready for my skills yet. Tempting, yes…but it just isn’t in the cards.
Posted in Systematic Viewpoints | No Comments »
March 10th, 2007 by admin
It appears I did well in my first interview with Google. While the NY recruiting committee hasn’t met yet, I’m assured that it’s a green light and the next round is likely to be be a trip to Mountain View to meet the home office people. Although their process can be pretty lengthy and I’m just at the beginning, that’s very exciting.
Posted in Archive, Systematic Viewpoints | No Comments »
March 7th, 2007 by admin
Two weeks ago I picked up Audi’s new Q7 SUV. It’s my third Audi, having had an A6 sedan for the last few years and the A6 Avant (wagon) prior to that, along with various euro-SUVs. I love Audis and the Q7 seems to be a great vehicle on all counts except for one glaring problem. German automakers like Audi, Mercedes-Benz and BMW have adopted a master controller for many functions in the car. Audi has MMI, BMW has iDrive and Mercedes calls it COMAND. The thinking is to provide access to controls and settings while reducing the ‘confusing’ array of dashboard controls.
Changing a radio station or CD track requires multiple steps. At worst the driver needs to select a function via one of eight buttons surrounding a knob, turn the knob to select a menu item and press the knob to select the function. If you are already in that function, you eliminate the intial button push but still have the turn and click. I have to take my eyes off the road frequently to check my selections. No matter how close to my line of sight the display is I’m no longer aware of what’s happening around me.
I acknowledge that these systems are known to require either long or steep learning curves. I want to give it a chance, but I hate it. Controls for vehicles need to be direct and avoid visual diversion beyond feedback for aiming at a control. I acknowledge that these systems are known to require either long or steep learning curves. I want to give it a chance, but I hate it. A system that complicates simple actions and requires learning to perform the same functions I perform simply and directly in my other vehicles is flawed and is exposing me to risk. My wife is completely intimidated by it.
Posted in Archive, Design, Systematic Viewpoints, User Experience | No Comments »